I’ve been thinking about philosophy lately. I can now see why people think its BS. A few days ago, in course of a few beers, I conversed with a well-school guy on the history of 1960’s and its consequences. There was a good amount give and take dialogue with common ideas in between. But a certain point, I concluded this guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Let me explain.
Exploration of ideas without consideration of real-world consequences is where people stop buying into whatever you’re saying or at least, I call BS. The guy asserted drugs like LSD, unadulterated use, are simply brain altering substances and can raise conscientiousness to a higher level.
Yeah right.
That’s hippie talk.
Multiple acid trips are good way to go crazy. Scientific literature journals on drug abuse and addiction express stuff like chronic LSD-induced psychosis and long-term flashbacks as significant adverse consequences to these drugs.
What about the therapeutic benefits to LSD? Yeah, there some work on treating alcoholism with it. But for the most part, this stuff is unpredictable as it depends on factors like setting, genetics, mind-set, expectations, and drug content purity.
Later, the idea of families living on communes as a viable lifestyle is nonsense. Imagine my head shacking no, side to side, at this point in time. I always ask myself, in this system, who is going to take out the trash? The idea is shared responsibility, no restrictions, live free kind of society. But reality is a bunch of potheads squatting a campsite, never scooping the 3 day old dog poo from the carpet, kids running around like Lord of the Flies, and every guy is father to some kid, but don’t know which one.
And here’s my thing: fine. I don’t care. Do all the free sex, love, and drugs to your heart’s content. But as soon as there’s a kid in the picture, I got a problem with it now. This is a good way to screw up a kid. The neglect of no adult supervision or parents, the abuse of horrible living standards, the non-sense of home schooling from screwballs, and then the denial that, hey, what is it to you, can’t judge, stop generalizing–folk, is dangerous and irresponsible.
So back to philosophy. This goes for right-wing philosophies too. One comes to mind. Pro-lifers adamant campaign against the morning after pill, or Plan B, and Wal-Mart’s move to relucntantly sell over the counter back a few years ago because a) pro-lifers belief its an abortion pill and b) it encourages sexual activity, and) its morally wrong/bad to give this to the public, specifically teenagers.
Here’s why I don’t buy into their campaign. Its a contraceptive pill that works exactly like birth control, that you take after sex instead of before. Awesome. Here’s a product that can reduce the number of abortions in this country. Awesome. And this can prevent unplanned pregnancies. Awesome. Do they bite? Nope. They say its an abortion pill and its dangerous to take it.
I suspect their stance is not motivated by pro-life, but teenagers having sex without consequences. They didn’t have sex in high school and judge those who did. And now its payback.
Instead on working on and coming to common ground with the pro-choice folk like reducing the rate of teenagers having sex, both are quite content to yell at each other on the margins.
Conclusion: I don’t like dogma or orthodoxy. Ideas are fine. I like playing with them and exploring them. But the neglect of real-world results suggests to me they don’t know what they are talking about. BS I call.
Bacq and Fourth